Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017)

Proximity and Consumer Trust in a Brand Crisis

  • Zoe Gardiner
  • Fiona Cownie
Submitted
December 31, 2017
Published
2017-12-31

Abstract

Brand crises cause detrimental effects for consumers and organisations. Over the last 50 years, Marketing, Public Relations and Communications disciplines have attempted to identify methods that can minimise such consequences for organisations. Consumers’ attitudinal and behavioural responses play a critical role for organisations during crisis, with responses including decreased satisfaction, purchase intention and trust. A review of existing brand crisis literature revealed an important mediator between brand crisis and consumers’ responses yet to be recognised. This study introduces the concept of proximity to the literature to better understand consumers’ responses to a brand crisis. The study proposes that consumers’ connection to a brand crisis, through product ownership and violation of shared values, will have a significant effect upon consumers’ trust in the affected organisation. A sequential mixed-method exploratory research design achieved insight into proximity through the collection of 6 in-depth interviews and 55 questionnaire responses. A significant variance is highlighted in negative responses between high proximity and low proximity groups, indicating that a closer connection to a brand crisis event elicits stronger negative responses and lower levels of trust post-crisis. The research enables the refinement of the proximity concept, allowing better conceptualisation and aiding its application within future research or practice. Proximity is explored using the context of three recent, large-scale crisis events; the 2015 Volkswagen emissions fault, Samsung Note 7 product fault in 2016 and the 2015 Talk Talk cyber-attack.

References

  1. Aaker, J., Fournier, S. and Brasel, S., A., 2004. When Good Brands Do Bad. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 31 (1), 1-16.
  2. Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E. and Unnava, R. H., 2000. Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment. Journal of Marketing Research [online], 37 (2), 203-214.
  3. Arpan, L. M. and Pompper, D., 2003. Stormy weather: testing “stealing thunder†as a crisis communication strategy to improve communication flow between organizations and journalists. Public Relations Review [online], 29, 291–308.
  4. BBC News Business, 2015. TalkTalk hack to cost up to £35m. BBC News [online], 11 November 2015. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34784980
  5. [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  6. BBC News Technology, 2016. Galaxy Note 7: Timeline of Samsung's phones woes.
  7. BBC News [online], 11 October 2016. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37615496 [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  8. Bell, J. and Opie, C., 2002. Learning from Research: Getting more from your data. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  9. Bell, J., and Waters, S., 2014. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers [online]. 6th edition. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
  10. Bissell, D., 2013. Pointless Mobilities: Rethinking Proximity Through the Loops of Neighbourhood. Mobilities Journal [online], 8 (3), 349-367.
  11. Boyatzis, R. E., 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  12. Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology [online], 3 (2), 77-101.
  13. Bryman, A., 1988. Quantity and quality in social research. London, Boston: Unwin Hyman Publications.
  14. Buckingham, L. and Kane, F., 2014. From the archive, 22 August 1992: Gerald Ratner's 'crap' comment haunts jewellery chain. The Guardian [online], 22 August 2014. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/22/gerald-ratner-jewellery-total-crap-1992-archive [Accessed 23 February 2017].
  15. Cambridge Dictionary, ca. 2017. Meaning of "proximity" in the English Dictionary [online]. Cambridge Dictionary: Cambridge University Press. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/proximity [Accessed 27 February 2017].
  16. Carley, K. M. and Lin, Z., 1995. Organizational designs suited to high performance under stress. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics [online], 25 (2), 221–230.
  17. Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook, M. B., 2001. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing [online], 65 (2), 81–93.
  18. Cheng, Y. Y., White, T. B. and Chaplin, L. N., 2012. The effects of self–brand connections on responses to brand failure: a new look at the consumer–brand relationship. Journal of Consumer Psychology [online], 22 (2), 280-288.
  19. Coombs, W. T. and Holladay, S. J., 2001. An extended examination of the crisis situations: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research [online], 13 (4), 321-340.
  20. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2011. Research methods in education [online]. 7th edition. Oxon: Routledge.
  21. Collins, H., 2010. Creative Research: The Theory and Practice of Research for the Creative Industries. Switzerland: AVA Publications.
  22. Creswell, J. W., 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  23. Crossman, A., 2017. What are Controlled Experiments? Determining Cause and Effect. ThoughtCo [online], 2 March 2017. Available from: https://www.thoughtco.com/controlled-experiments-3026547 [Accessed 16 May 2017].
  24. Dahlén, M. and Lange, F., 2006. A disaster is contagious: How a brand in crisis affects other brands. Journal of Advertising Research [online], 46 (4), 388-397.
  25. Dawar, M. and Lei, J., 2009. Brand crisis: the roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research [online], 62 (4), 509-516.
  26. Daymon, C. and Holloway, I., 2011. Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
  27. Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J. L., and Yague-GuillenL, M. J., 2003. Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research [online], 45 (1), 35–53.
  28. Delgado-Ballester, E. and Munuera-Aleman, J. L., 2005. Does brand trust matter to brand equity? Journal of Product and Brand Management [online], 14 (3), 187-196.
  29. Denzin, N. K., 2009. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 4th ed. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  30. Droege, S., Anderson, J. and Bowler, M., 2003. Trust and organisational information flow. Journal of Business and Management [online], 9 (1), 45-59.
  31. Dudovskiy, J., 2016. The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: A Step-by-Step Assistance [online]. Research Methodology.
  32. Dutta, S. and Pullig, C., 2011. Effectiveness of corporate responses to brand crises: The role of crisis type and response strategies. Journal of Business Research [online], 64 (12), 1281-1287.
  33. Erdem, T., and Swait, J., 2004. Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 31 (1), 191–198.
  34. Farrell, S., 2016. Samsung share price dives after Galaxy Note 7 phone recall. The Guardian [online], 12 September 2016. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/12/samsung-galaxy-note-7-share-prices-dives-phone-recall [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  35. Fournier, S., 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 24, 343-73.
  36. Fincham, F. D., Jackson, H., and Beach, S., R., H., 2005. Transgression severity and forgiveness: Different moderators for objective and subjective severity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology [online], 24 (6), 860–875.
  37. Gray, C., 2011. Social media: A guide for researchers [online]. London: Research Information Network.
  38. Grégoire, Y., Tripp, T. M., Legoux, R., 2009. When Customer Love Turns into Lasting Hate: The Effects of Relationship Strength and Time on Customer Revenge and Avoidance. Journal of Marketing [online], 73 (6), 18-32.
  39. Heejung, L. and Myung, S. K., 2010. The Impact of Brand Transgressions on Relationship Strength: Moderating Roles of Brand Personality and Consumer Loss Type. Allied Academies International Conference, Academy of Marketing Studies [online], 15 (1), 29-34.
  40. Hesse-Biber, S. N., 2010. Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice [online]. Surrey: The Guildford Press.
  41. Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. and Vogel, C., 2003. Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. London: Sage.
  42. Hotten, R., 2015. Volkswagen: The scandal explained. BBC News [online], 10 December 2015. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34324772
  43. [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  44. Huang, L. Y., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A. and Pedersen, H., T., 2015. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online. CSCW '15 Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing [online], 969-980.
  45. Huber, F., Vollhardt, K., Matthes, I. and Vogel, J., 2010. Brand misconduct: Consequences on consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Business Research [online], 63 (11), 1113-1120.
  46. Information Commissioner’s Office, 2016. TalkTalk gets record £400,000 fine for failing to prevent October 2015 attack [online]. ICO News and Events: Information Commissioner's Office. Available from: https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2016/10/talktalk-gets-record-400-000-fine-for-failing-to-prevent-october-2015-attack/ [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  47. IQS Research, 2015. Social Media as a Research Tool – The Danger of Selection Bias [online]. Gallery: IQS Research. Available from: http://iqsresearch.com/social-media-as-a-research-tool-the-danger-of-selection-bias/ [Accessed 16 May 2017].
  48. Jamieson, S., 2004. Likert Scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education [online], 38, 1212-1218.
  49. Jankowicz, A. D., 2005. Business Research Projects. 4th ed. London: Thomson Learning.
  50. Jeon, J. O. and Baeck, S., 2016. What drives consumer's responses to brand crisis? The moderating roles of brand associations and brand-customer relationship strength. Journal of Product and Brand Management [online], 25 (6), 550-567.
  51. Johar, G. V., Birk, M. M., Einwiller, S. A., 2010. How to Save Your Brand In the Face of Crisis. MIT Sloan Management Review [online], 51 (4), 57-64.
  52. Kang, J. and Hustvedt, G., 2014. Building Trust Between Consumers and Corporations: The Role of Consumer Perceptions of Transparency and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics [online], 125 (2), 253-265.
  53. Klein, J. and Dawar, N., 2004. Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing [online], 21 (3), 203-217.
  54. Kollewe, J., 2015. Volkswagen emissions scandal - timeline. The Guardian [online], 10 December 2015. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/dec/10/volkswagen-emissions-scandal-timeline-events [Accessed 21 March 2017].
  55. Latson, 2014. How Poisoned Tylenol Became a Crisis Management Teaching Model. Time [online], 29 September 2014. Available from: http://time.com/3423136/tylenol-deaths-1982/ [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  56. Lin, A. C., 1998. Bridging Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Qualitative Methods. Policy Studies Journal [online], 26 (1), 162-180.
  57. Lisjak, M., Lee, A. Y. and Gardner, W. L., 2012. When a threat to the brand is a threat to the self the importance of brand identification and implicit self-esteem in predicting defensiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin [online], 38 (9), 1120-1132.
  58. MacInnis, D. J., 2011. A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing. Journal of Marketing [online], 75 (4), 136-154.
  59. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. B., 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  60. Matthews, B. and Ross, L., 2010. Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Harlow: Pearson.
  61. Matzler, K., Grabner-Kräuter, S., and Bidmon, S., 2008. Risk aversion and brand loyalty: the mediating role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of Product and Brand Management [online], 17 (3), 154–162.
  62. McCullough, M. E., 2001. Forgiveness: Who Does It and How Do They Do It? Current Directions in Psychological Science [online], 10 (6), 194-197.
  63. Morgan, R., M. and Hunt, S., D., 1994. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing [online], 58 (3), 20-38.
  64. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Leech, N. L., 2005. On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology [online], 8 (5), 375-387.
  65. Palmer, K. and McGoogan, C., 2016. TalkTalk loses 101,000 customers after hack. The Telegraph [online], 2 February 2016. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/02/02/talktalk-loses-101000-customers-after-hack/ [Accessed 21 March 2017].
  66. Perrow, C., 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books Inc.
  67. Pullig, C., Netemeyer, R. G. and Biswas, A., 2006. Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science [online], 34 (4), 528-542.
  68. Punch, K., F., 2005. Introduction to Social Research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. 2nd edition. London: SAGE Publications.
  69. Reuters, 2016. Amazon and Starbucks 'pay less tax than a sausage stand', Austria says. The Guardian [online], 2 September 2016. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/02/multinationals-amazon-starbucks-austria-says [Accessed 17 May 2017].
  70. Rice, R. E. and Aydin, C., 1991. Attitudes Toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. Administrative Science Quarterly [online], 36 (2), 219-244.
  71. Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
  72. Roehm, M, L. and Brady, M. K., 2007. Consumer Responses to Performance Failures by High-Equity Brands. Journal of Consumer Research [online], 34 (4), 537-545.
  73. Roehm, M. L. and Tybout, A. M., 2006. When Will a Brand Scandal Spill Over, and How Should Competitors Respond? Journal of Marketing Research [online], 43 (3), 366-373.
  74. Rose, D. and Sullivan, O., 1996. Introducing Data Analysis for Social Scientists. 2nd edition. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  75. Rudestam, K. E. and Newton, R. R., 2007. Surviving Your Dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  76. Sandelowski, M., 2000. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Research in Nursing and Health [online], 23, 246-255.
  77. Samsung, 2016. An open letter to all Galaxy Note7 customers [online]. Samsung UK Newsroom: Samsung. Available from: http://www.samsung.com/uk/note7exchange/customernotice/openletter/ [Accessed 29 April 2017].
  78. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. 2012. Research Methods for Business Students. 6th edition. Harlow: Pearson.
  79. Schmalz, S. and Orth, U. R., 2012. Brand attachment and consumer emotional response to unethical firm behaviour. Psychology and Marketing [online], 29 (11), 869-884.
  80. Sekhon, H., Ennew, C., Kharouf, H. and Devlin, J., 2014. Trustworthiness and trust: influences and implications. Journal of Marketing Management [online], 30 (3), 409-430.
  81. Sherrell, D., Reidenback, E. R., Moore, E., Wagle, J. and Spratlin, T., 1985. Exploring consumer response to negative publicity. Public Relations Review [online], 11 (1), 13-28.
  82. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. and Sabol, B., 2002. Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges. Journal of Marketing [online], 66 (1), 15-37.
  83. Smith, A. K. and Bolton, R. N., 2002. The Effect of Customers' Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgements. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science [online], 30 (1), 5-23.
  84. Steinman, R. B. and Wolfrom, B. T., 2012. The Effect of Brands' Unethical Actions on Consumers' Attitudes in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods Domain. Business Management Dynamics [online], 2 (3), 32-39.
  85. Sullivan, G. M. and Artino, A. R. Jr, 2013. Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education [online], 5 (4), 541-542.
  86. Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A., 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  87. Tomlinson, E., Dineen, B. and Lewicki, R., 2004. The road to reconciliation: antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management [online], 30 (2), 165-187.
  88. Trump, R. K., 2014. Connected consumers' responses to negative brand actions: The roles of transgression self-relevance and domain. Journal of Business Research [online], 67 (9), 1824-1830.
  89. Tsarenko, Y. and Tojib, D., 2012. The role of personality characteristics and service failure severity in consumer forgiveness and service outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management [online], 28 (9), 1217–1239.
  90. Tsarenko, Y. and Tojib, D., 2015. Consumers' forgiveness after brand transgression: the effect of the firm's corporate social responsibility and response. Journal of Marketing Management [online], 31 (17), 1851-1877.
  91. Tuckett, A. G., 2005. Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher's experience. Contemporary Nurse [online], 19 (1), 75-87.
  92. Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K. and Dekimpe, M. G., 2007. The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science [online], 26 (2), 230-245.
  93. Vassilikopoulou, A., Siomkos, G., Chatzipanagiotou, K. and Pantouvakis, A., 2009. Product-harm crisis management: Time heals all wounds? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services [online], 16 (3), 174-180.
  94. Wang, S. and Huff, L. C., 2007. Explaining buyers' responses to sellers' violation of trust. European Journal of Marketing [online], 41 (9), 1033-1052.
  95. Weber, R., 2004. Editor's Comments: The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism: A Personal View. MIS Quarterly [online], 28 (1), iii-xii.
  96. Willmott, M., 2003. Citizen brands: corporate citizenship, trust and branding. Journal of Brand Management [online], 10 (4), 362–369.
  97. Wu, J., 2011. The effects of brand crisis on brand evaluation and consumer's willingness of brand relationship rebuilding: The moderating effect of self-image congruence. Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management [online], 303-307.
  98. Xie, Y. and Peng, S., 2009. How to Repair Customer Trust After Negative Publicity: The Roles of Competence, Integrity, Benevolence, and Forgiveness. Psychology and Marketing [online], 26 (7), 572-589.
  99. Xingyuan, W., Li, F. and Wei, Y., 2010. How Do They Really Help? An Empirical Study of the Role of Different Information Sources in Building Brand Trust. Journal of Global Marketing [online], 23 (3), 243-252.
  100. Yannopoulou, N., Koronis, E. and Elliott, R., 2011. Media amplification of a brand crisis and its effect on brand trust. Journal of Marketing Management [online], 27 (5), 530-546.