Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Special Edition on Thought Leadership for PR

Without Proper Regulation, is Corporate Social Responsibility just a Public Relations Tool?

  • Vivien Lebbon
Submitted
February 7, 2017
Published
2017-02-07

Abstract

Since 2000, we have seen corporate social responsibility (CSR) become integrated more frequently within business strategies, making it less about public relations (PR) and more about society. However, there have been various cases recently where high profile brands have been publically shamed for misusing CSR in some way or another, like Volkswagen, who designed technology to deliberately falsify emissions data in 2015, undermining their previously awarded CSR commitments and activities. One of the main reasons behind this is the fact that there is little or no clear regulation, standards or guidelines for CSR and because of this companies have little fear of the consequences if caught misusing it. The following article examines the view that without legal supervision CSR is discretionary to each and every company, allowing them to cherry-pick issues, which in most cases just align with Western values and do not transfer to other parts of the world. This means that companies often ignore pressing issues and merely focus on the most convenient

References

  1. Alves, I.M., 2009. Green Spin Everywhere: How Greenwashing reveals the limits of the CSR paradigm. Journal of Global Change and Governance [online], 2 (1), 1-26.
  2. Banerjee, S.B., 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  3. BBC, 2015. Volkswagen: The scandal explained [online]. London: BBC. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34324772 [Accessed 1 May 2016].
  4. BBC, 2016. Mitsubishi Motors admits falsifying fuel economy tests. London: BBC. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36089558 [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  5. Blowfield, M., and Murray, A., 2012. Corporate responsibility: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Butterick, K., 2011. Introducing Public Relations: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
  7. Cowther, D., and Islam, M.A., 2015. Sustainability after Rio. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  8. Dahlsrud, A., 2006. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management [online], 15 (1), 1-13.
  9. Delmas, M.A., and Burbano, V.C., 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review [online], 54 (1), 64-87.
  10. Department for Business Innovation and Skills, 2014. Corporate Responsibility: Good for Business and Society: government response to call for views on corporate responsibility [online]. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
  11. Diochen, P.F., Raufflet, E., and Mills, A.J., 2013. The Dark Side 2: Critical cases on the downside of business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
  12. Entine, J., 1995. Rain-forest chic. Torronto Globe and Mail Report on Business. 20 (4), 41-52.
  13. Falck, O., and Helbich, S., 2007. Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons [online], 50 (3), 247-254.
  14. Fetscherin, M., 2015. CEO Branding: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  15. Forbes, 2012. The Gulf Spill: BP Still Doesn’t Get It [online]. New York: Forbes. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickallen/2012/04/20/the-gulf-spill-bp-still-doesnt-get-it/#39ab1fb520f9 [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  16. Forbes, 2013. Enron, Ethics and Today’s Corporate Values [online]. New York: Forbes. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2013/05/14/enron-ethics-and-todays-corporate-values/#4d3132697688 [Accessed 2 May 2016].
  17. Forbes, 2015. Volkswagen and The Failure of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Forbes. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/enriquedans/2015/09/27/volkswagen-and-the-failure-of-corporate-social-responsibility/#23d5f4a56128 [4 May 2016].
  18. Forbes, 2016. Neutrogena’s Attempt to Empower Women Backfires [online]. New York: Forbes. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/willburns/2016/02/25/neutrogenas-attempt-to-empower-women-backfires/#6341a7d2fdd9 [Accessed 1 May 2016].
  19. Frankental, P., 2001. Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6 (1), 18-23.
  20. Frynas, J.G., 2005. The false development promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81 (3), 581-598.
  21. Greenpeace, 2010. Greenpeace Greenwash Criteria: ‘Adbluster’ [online]. Washington, DC: Greenpeace. Available from: http://www.stopgreenwash.org/ [Accessed 20 April 2016].
  22. Johnson, G., and Scholes, K., 2002. Exploring corporate strategy. 6th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
  23. Horrigan, B., 2007. 21st century corporate social responsibility trends – an emerging comparative body of law and regulation on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability. Macquarie Journal of Business Law, 4 (85), 85-122.
  24. Low, K.C.P., and Idowu, S.O. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: Practice and Experience. London: Springer.
  25. Kirkpatrick, G., 2008. The corporate governance lessons from the Financial Crash [online]. London: OECD. Report 2684.
  26. Kincaid, M., 2012. Building corporate social responsibility through servant-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies [online], 7 (2) 151-172.
  27. Maniruzzaman, A.F.M., 2011. Creeping legitimacy of corporate social responsibility [online]. Amicus Curiae, 85 (3), 2-4.
  28. McDonalds, 2016. Environment: Striving for a sustainable future [online]. London: McDonalds. Available from: http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/ukhome/Ourworld/Environment.html [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  29. Mobus, J.L., 2012. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Reporting by BP: Revealing or Obscuring risks? Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues [online]. 15 (2), p.236-241.
  30. Moss, D., and DeSanto, B., 2011. Public Relations: A managerial perspective. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  31. Mullerat, R., 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Corporate Governance of the 21st Century. The Hague, NL: Kluwer Law International.
  32. Mullerat, R.., and Brennan, D., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Corporate Governance of the 21st Century. 2nd Ed. The Hague, NL: Kluwer Law International.
  33. Newel, P., 2005. Citizenship, accountability and community: the limits of the CSR agenda. International Affairs, 81 (3), 541-557.
  34. Open Democracy, 2014. The problem with corporate social responsibility [online]. London: Open Democracy. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/joanne-bauer/problem-with-corporate-social-responsibility [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  35. Phillips, A.F., Williams, R., Harvey, D.M., and Bosco, S.M., 2014. The negative implications of corporate social responsibility [online]. Thesis (PhD). Roger Williams University, C.A.
  36. The Guardian, 2015. Banking culture review: Treasury defends FCA decision to scrap study [online]. London: The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/dec/31/banking-culture-review-john-mcdonnell-urges-george-osborne [Accessed 4 May 2016].
  37. The Guardian, 2016. McDonald’s staff lovin’ the fight for rights. London: The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/19/mcdonalds-staff-lovin-the-fight-for-rights [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  38. TriplePundit, 2015. CSR after the Volkswagen Scandal [online]. San Francisco: TriplePundit. Available from: http://www.triplepundit.com/2015/10/csr-volkswagen-scandal/# [2 May 2016].
  39. Vogel, D., 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington: The Bookings Institution.